                                        
Universe's
Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE)

^©The WIT Particle^©

cover sketchy design (Dorrance Publishing) FURNISHED

Note to the On Line reader: The text on this on line copy on the web is best viewed in MS Internet Explorer, Firefox, or MS Front Page. Be sure to set your Text Size, in View in the browser's menu, to medium. Also for best reading press your F11 key for full page view LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR copy/paste TEXT

Contents:

Preface: The Scientific Controversy

Chapter 1: Universe's, Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE)

Chapter 2: Artificial Intelligence

Chapter 3:  Mass-Wave Formula, Unified Theory of the Universe (WIT Particles)

Chapter 4: Mass-Wave Formula (Light Photon and Mass) Fairbairn's Hypothesis

Chapter 5: Is the Universe God?

Chapter 6:  Rossum's Universal Robots ( R.U.R.)

Chapter 7: They Do Not Know That They Are Not Human.

Chapter 8:  Universe Always Was and Always Will Be

Chapter 9:  Space Is Not a Vacuum

Chapter 10: The Universe Is Expanding--But How?

Chapter 11: Energy Beams (ENERGY BEAM^©)

Chapter 12: Expansion of the Universe, Time Has No Beginning or End

Chapter 13: Solar Storms and the CME's Reduction Velocity

Chapter 14: The First Light of Conscience in Humans

Chapter 15: What Is the Mind's ID?

Chapter 16: Vortexes Everywhere From the So-called Black Hole to the Magnet

Chapter 17: The Ageless (Eternal) Universe

Chapter 18: The Conscious Universe

Chapter 19: Computer Software and the Human Brain; Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intuitive Intelligence (II)

Chapter 20: Is Mathematics the Language of the Universe?

Chapter 21: Why Are We Humans Here on Earth?

Chapter 22: Humans, Intelligent Design, and Evolutionary Theories of the Universe

Chapter 23: Religion Is the Opiate of the People

Chapter 24: Fairbairn's Swimming Pool Experiments Mimic a Model of the ether (WIT) Particle Seas, of the Universe

Chapter 25: The Human Sixth Sense in the Sphere of Data Transmission via Super Down Load Techniques (SDR)

Chapter 26: Gravity Is Not an Attractive or Repelling Force, but It Appears So

Chapter 27: Magnetism and Vortexes, A Short Statement

Photos

PREFACE

    NASA view of the Universe towards deep space

Chapter 1

    International Space Station

    Double Helix Nebula

Chapter 3

    Active Galactic Nuclei AGN

Operational Helium Energy Beam

Chapter 4

Dimensional Analysis Simplified Graphic

Standing wave around the wave-center 'particle'

Graphic, and Photo's: Cerenkov's Light

Gaseous Ionic Oscillator (no tuned circuits).

Pulse Generator Waveforms Gaseous Ionic Oscillator

Practical Gaseous Ionic Oscillator Device

Chapter 7

Repliee Q1Expo (Japanese Robot)

Scientific Historical Novel Lords of the Crescent

Chapter 9

Milky Way Galaxy

Chapter 10

Hurricane Katrina,

Messier 81 Galaxy

Saturn's South Poles Hurricane

Multiple Photos of Saturn's Hurricanes

Hurricane Claudette

Artist Drawing by NASA's, Chandra X-Ray, and Euorpean Space Center Telescopes

Chapter 11

Mass Radiation Device Laser Energy Beam, Patent 3,872,209, Fairbairn

RF Energy Beam Test Facility at China Lake Naval Weapons Facility

Chapter 13

Sun's CME Mass Ejection

Chapter 17

RF Energy Beam Directed into a Quartz Glass Tube

DC Helium Energy Beam^© into Fresh Water Nitrate Generator

Chapter 21

M-13's Position in the Star Field

Chapter 22

Sears Tower Chicago, Ill., USA

Chapter 24

Two spiral galaxies pass by each other like majestic ships in the night

Three hurricanes from tropical depressions, in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico

Chapter 25

Hercules Constellation Showing M-13 Map Star Cluster Circled at Eight O'clock Dial

Jet aircraft breaking the sound barrier, V cone wake

V Wave Conic Three Dimension FNAL Visual Media Services

Sailing out of Key West, Florida's harbor with the Earth's atmospheric wind molecule

Chapter 26

Deep impact spacecraft copper ball crash landing target a comet.

PREFACE

The Scientific Controversy

Important guidance to the reader, from the author:

One must read the entire book, without doing so the reader will never understand and absorbed its total theory. Selectively reading and quoting parts of individual chapters will hinder the reader's grasp for the theory of Universe's ether particle atmospheric existence, from the macroscopic to the microscopic. True, each chapter does communicate parts of the theory based on operational facts, photographs, equipment demonstrations, inventions, and conclusions accordingly.

The text in blue color, effect, or Cerenkov's¹ are hyperlinks on line, or located on the UIDE 3 inch CD, and can be restored on the reader's computer by adding www or http: as required. The exponent refers the reader to the full computer on-line web address. (Refer to the book's References.)

Five of the scientific ambiguities among many that puzzle the Earth's people and their scientists are:

#1. Does the Universe have an ether atmosphere (dark matter, dark energy, particles)?

#2. Is the Universe eternal?

#3. Was the Universe created out of nothing during a Big Bang?

#4. Did a God create the Universe?

#5. What is the origin of life ?

1.Does the Universe have an ether atmosphere (dark matter, dark energy, particles)?

NASA view of the Universe towards deep space

The Universe is immense beyond all imagination of individual humans on Earth. One can see in the deep space photograph by NASA an obvious tilting of the galaxies at many different angles. This seems to infer that some background galaxies are on the surface of a transparent expanded globe. This globe probably is rotating; however, because of its size, perception of the rotational movement on Earth, in our Milky Way galaxy, is impossible to measure. Of course the Hubble camera was looking in one direction, so where are we with respect to the globe? My guess is in the outer shell of the globe through which we are now looking, the shell being very thick but transparent to various frequencies of radiation infra red (UV, visual light, X rays, gamma rays, micro waves, radio waves, etc).

Here is a deep space stereo-like photo ⁴⁴ in part from NASA's Hubble space telescope. Imagine the points (when viewing this stereo photo) that I have pointed out earlier, for a rotating Universe. The red shift can also be viewed, at the yellow galaxy indicating rotation. Hubble and its replacement JWT telescopes are capable of, generating stereoscopic time-lapsed 3D photos. I also wish to point out that if the earth were transparent and if one could see through the earth at the various hurricanes, tornado etc. on the so call transparent globe. We could also see through the earth to hurricanes on the other side--the same for a rotating Universe. These hurricanes are similar to galaxies. The hurricanes and tornados on a transparent earth would viewed at all angles similar to the stereo photo I have referenced. They are in the earth's thin atmosphere which is also particle like. As the earth is part of the Universe's globe, we can not see the entire globe; however, we can see the Universe's in depth curvature.

Observation of the red shift exhibited less red shift than expected, indicating that the expansion of the Universe across the globe's surface is speeding up. It also implies that the Universe is rotating. A rotating Universe would be gyroscopic, the source of gravity ,g, on Earth. (Refer to Chapter 26). Where are the galaxies of the Universe going? (Refer to the red shift in the distant white dwarf supernova, SN 1997ff, as a bright nova next to the yellow galaxy at the lower left of the above photo.) There appears to be an area in the center of this photo (left to right) that is dark. What this means is important; however, I am not sure of the results of this observation.

While galaxies expand across its surface in all directions, the see-through effect might indicate galaxies are farther away than the foreground surface because they reside on the opposite side of the orb-like formation. The various tilts of the galactic plane may indicate that the galaxies pictured reside across the entire circumference of the Universe's globe-like formation.

NASA's Office of Space Science published in The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics:

Scientists are hesitant to modify the known "laws" of physics–especially something like Einstein's theory of gravity, which has been very well tested over the past century. But with something as perplexing as dark energy, it is important to leave no stone unturned. Several leading scientists are now investigating the possibility that the most cherished laws of physics may need to be modified.

It is possible this may signal a new aspect of the law of gravity that Einstein overlooked. (For further information, refer to Chapter 12: Expansion of the Universe.) The inconsistency between two incompatible theories, that of the General Theory of Relativity (the understanding of mass in space) and the Quantum Mechanics Theory the understanding of mass particles on the subatomic scale are reciprocally incompatible. The WIT particle calculations in Chapter 4 may explain the two reciprocally incomatible theories.

The WIT particle mass was calculated by myself as a mass of 7.371963x 10^-
48grams. (Refer to Chapter 4 for calculations and mathematical proof.) The Hubble telescope observations imply that dark matter ether must exist, as only about 4 percent of the mass of the Universe (as an estimate) can be accounted for. The WIT particle existence in Newton's Universe's sea could be detected by Cerenkov's¹ radiation detectors. Look at all of the space between galaxies in the above photo; it certainly is not a void, otherwise the Universe would collapse and no radiation could traverse its breath.

The Universe's atmosphere is a mixture of many other radiations and gases such as plasma, dust particles, ice, and many chemical mixtures, depending where one measures. But the basic particles of Newton's ether (perhaps dark matter) is the WIT particle. This is the atmosphere light waves navigate. Radiation photons cannot navigate empty space; they must have a medium to traverse. The WIT particle atmosphere of the Universe may make up the elusive dark matter to which so many scientist have referred.

Marusa Bradac of the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC), located at the Department of Energy’s Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), has said, "we had predicted the existence of dark matter for decades, but now we've seen it in action." The method that they used made the landmark observations by studying a galaxy cluster three billion light years away. Dark matter, the elusive stuff that makes up a quarter of the Universe, may have been seen in isolation for the first time.

I have viewed the photos that Marusa's team took, and there is some possibilities that the blue light they viewed from the dark matter may be a form of Cerenkov's radiation, as I predicted, which may be able to detect the dark matter of the ether consisting of WIT particles,etc. I am impessed with their discoveries. In nuclear power plants, Cerenkov's radiation can be see as a blue light in the cooling water, this light is produced by high velocity electrons which travel faster then the velocity of light normally found in water.

Astronomer researcher from Johns Hopkins University Baltimore (James Jee) using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope discovered a ghostly ring of dark matter²⁷ that formed long ago during a titanic collision between two massive galaxy clusters. The ring's discovery is among the strongest evidence yet that dark matter exists. Astronomers have long suspected the existence of the invisible substance as the source of additional gravity that holds together galaxy clusters. Such clusters would fly apart if they relied only on the gravity from their visible stars. Although astronomers don't know what dark matter is made of, they hypothesize that it is a type of elementary particle that pervades the Universe.

Regardless of these reported observations, my own thought is that such dark matter expanding rings do exist on a macular scale everywhere in the Universe. Such rings are analogist to Tsunami waves that are caused by giant underwater earthquakes in the Earth's atmospheric oceans. I would think that they are singular as James Jee has discovered, but could also have a following ring expanding across the ether atmosphere of the Universe. I might also comment that the velocity of these type of dark matter rings (waves) in the particle sea of the Universe can not be measured at this time, and they travel no where near the velocity of a light wave in the ether. One thing these dark matter ring announcements do, is provide evidences that the ether must exist as the particle atmosphere of the Universe.

The WIT particles' mass of 7.371963x 10^-
48 grams, and Fairbairn's ether constant, k_f = h /c², was calculated considering the density of the Universe's ether and the velocity of light waves, c, moving across its ether sea. The particle size was determined by that fact because only an ether atmosphere can support the two states of energy, that of the photon radiation and mass, and the gravity that supports their two states of energy. If the ultra violet light velocity standard maintained by the U.S. Bureau of Standards is in error, a recalculation of the Fairbairn's Ether constant, k_f,is vital.

Webster ’s dictionary definition for a WIT is: "the limit of one's mental resources; also, at one's wits' end," further translated by myself to: that which is the smallest mass particle one can imagine or measure. Note: the composition of Newton's ether atmosphere of the Universe is the WIT particles. (Refer to Chapter 4 for calculations.) I chose Planck's constant to calculate the WIT particle mass, the motive being, Planck's Time is a measure of the time a wave of UV light in ether takes to cross the distance equal to the Planck Length. Planck length is a measure of the density of the WIT particle ether atmosphere of the Universe. Thus determining the speed of UV light in the ether of the Universe's atmosphere.

The use of the terms dark matter and dark energy are tossed around by physicist and astronomers lightly, but they really mean the particle matter of the Universe's Ether atmosphere.

2.Is the Universe eternal? Evolution on Earth is building a living thinking, organism, and the Earth does change, improve and repair itself. This is accomplished through the Universe's inhabitants and structure on Earth (humans, plants, volcanoes, hurricanes, and other living species) directed by the Universe's intelligences. The Universe itself is eternal but constantly changing. One very compelling concept is that all Earth's creatures, including man must breath air supplied by the atmosphere. This then makes man a part of Earth's ecology and also a part of this living organism--the Earth itself. If man leaves the Earth he must bring his environment with him.

Further proof of evolution on a living organism, the Earth, is the Earth's coral reefs. Coral looks and behaves like a plant but is a living organism. If the coral reefs are destroyed by hurricanes, the corals die and turns to rubble; However, the living seeds left behind, newborn life that escaped the destruction, swim back to the rubble and reconstruct new and even greater living coral reefs.

Within the coral reefs fish, and other life (species) eat each other for food, the same as man does to the food chain. Only man says he is not cannibalistic. This coral life however is living proof that Earth is a living organism and can repair itself, even improve on the passage between life and death, and man is part of this living Earth organism.

3. Was the Universe created out of nothing during a big bang. Certainly not true, I believe the Big Bang, in some form, did happen about 13 to 15 billion years ago, as scientists have conjectured; however, its origin is clouded with controversy. It did not create the Universe; however, it probably created the vast section of the Universe which our Milky Way Galaxy's Sun Earth solar system now occupies.

4. Did a God create the Universe? If a God did exist to create the Universe, he would have had to be part of the Universe. Therefore, the Universe would eternally exist prior to the Big Bang, or none of us would be here now. This does not prove creation or religious intelligent design (Id) of the Universe by an implied superior being. Darwinism, however, is not the whole story either, as evolution happened well before Darwin's discoveries, his proven theories being only part of the evolutionary history. Those of us who have had the good fortune of living the past eighty years appreciate that Earth's people, cities, and technology have evolved into a tremendous advance in our civilization within those eighty sum years. Think what ten thousand years can do.

Most of the above mentioned scientific and theoretical arguments are a constant source of questions. The cry from the many theoretical and scientific experts says, "Prove it." Go to any online forum on the internet, and one will see how badly divided the world's communities are, with regard to answers to the above arguments. You would be amazed at the amount of advice an author like me gets from the readers of the forums. Most people, students, and scientists have been schooled in the concept of experimental proof and constant argument as to any new theory that threatens what they have learned in university, etc. New theories, even if valid, are required to fight the rigid rules of the established groups in science and religion. Most people on Earth are frozen in their ideas and thoughts and are in a proverbial deep freeze. Only the free thinker is eager to look to new theories about an intelligent Universe.

There are constant theoretical arguments regarding from where Earth, the Universe, and humans come. The Universe has a consciousness and a particle atmosphere. Earth is also evolving into a living, thinking organism. Men are a product of Earth's evolution; however, some earthmen may have been in part inbred by a superior being (alien) from who knows where.

5.What is the origin of life? As scientists look for answers, they have drilled a mile deep into the basalt of the ocean floor observing tiny microbes living on a diet of rock and warmth from volcanic emitting pipes. Life has been found in astonishing places for years. Submarine divers have found huge colonies of weird creatures relaxing in a kind of chemical plethora at the bottom of the ocean's depths, far away from any sunlight. As to whether these weird creatures require oxygen (air) to exist (as humans and most other species do) is questionable.

The theory of the Universe's Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE)^©, is a guiding means (a road map) of Newton's Universe's ether sea construction and operation. This Intelligent Design (ID) and Intuitive Intelligence (II) is not to be mistaken with the suggested religious version of Intelligent design (Id), which leaves Evolution out of the human enlightenment.

To further understand the origin of life on Earth through UIDE, scientists have studied where life exists on Earth. For example, microbes have been found in acid flows, in the down vents of volcanoes, in lakes of soda, an on the under side of the polar ice, arranging the planet for the rest of creation. Scientists have detected bacteria living contentedly in high clouds, procreating, some seeding the water vapor and causing raindrops or hail. Who knows what kind of bacteria is then deposited on Earth's land or oceans. These low life forms of bacterial life are contributing to the vitality of Earth. Earth is a living organism. Bacteria thrives in Yellowstone's hot springs and rocks and at the bottom of Lake Yellowstone. These strange marinelike creatures survive in extreme heat and without oxygen. All these living beings are made from the basic WIT particles and their fabrication by UIDE. (Refer to Chapter 21.)

I would remind the reader that bacteria also exist in the intestines of men on Earth; and without them in a symbiotic relationship, we could not survive as a species on Earth. Of course bacteria in the wrong place in man can destroy him, thus a constant war between the two major residents of this Earth. One should not overlook viruses causing DNA programming errors in both species. Earth's human inhabitants, including the millions of other species living in, on, and outside the atmosphere, are in the process of building an interconnected brain network, for Earth's living organism.

Many scientist, medical doctors, and others have noticed that bacteria seem to be intelligent. When ever man brings up a new medical weapon to fight these nano sized bacteria species, the nano sized bacteria families gain immunity. As their intelligent community fights man, he is shepherd into a never-ending battle. It is my belief that individual bacterial nematodes are individually at a disadvantage, however when an entire community works on a programmed problem collectively, the bacterial families overwhelms man almost every time. The lesson learned is the nano world families may be approaching a degree of cerebral thinking as the earths species of man has. Man therefore only thinks he is superior to all other species. Intellectual capacity therefore exist in two directions, the microscopic (nano technology) and macroscopic space technology.

Evolution on Earth is obvious archeologists have found Lucy's baby' skull in remote Ethiopia a lower form of man dated as living three million years ago on Earth. Compared to modern babies, Lucy was inferior. The evolution of some of Earth's human like species, certainly has come a long way in brain power since Baby Lucy.This does not mean that all present Earthmen are descendents from Lucy Baby.

This manuscript, before it was publish as a book, was written in real time on the Internet, and it set forth a new theory, the Universe's Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE). Regardless of how this manuscript proposes to answer the great scientific controversy, many readers believe they know better and confront this argument with, Where are your scientific proofs? Or, do you expect me to accept it on faith alone? Others will ask, is it logical? Still others will give you a list of what the current scientific formula is for accepted scientific manuscript presentation and theories. These rules of writing are designed to prevent new ideas from surfacing or being published in a prominent journal; however, I am not constrained by them here in.

Small minds will attack the grammar or sentence construction of this theory, completely missing the point of UIDE. UIDE is a road map to future understanding of our Universe's continuation. Perhaps some reader’s nuance tells us that the human brain still has not evolved enough to understand this reality. In fact one wonders if Earthmen can ever understand. . . .

I have placed this manuscript on the Internet, evolving as I wrote (now published in color in book form). It was written as an electronic Ebook in HTML language, corrected and processed by my understanding, my editor, and my computer's grammar and spelling translations.

I also placed the HTML form of this manuscript (just as the reader now views it as an Ebook) on a three inch CD. This three-inch CD will enable the reader of my book to track the many referenced web articles printed in the book live on the Internet as he reads my manuscript. The HTML version of this manuscript will remain on line until the book version is in book-stores, etc. A free coupon has been placed on the inside back cover that grants the buyer of my book this free Ebook three-inch CD.

We must understand that our Earth languages are subject to nuances, misunderstandings, and misinterpretations. I quote: Re: Machine English Translation: I'm Sick of Waiting. Posted: 09-19-2006, 11:35 AM: on Hypography Science Forum (HSF),

Computers are not capable of abstract thought. Machines only can calculate logical conclusions, they cannot imagine and they cannot make conclusions based solely on intuition.

Human language is complex in all its forms. English especially so. As my brother likes to say: "English is the only language where your nose can run and your feet can smell." A computer would simply trip over such abstract wording.

Language involves nearly infinite possibilities, and the meaning is interpreted by the user based on far more factors than just the words themselves. Native US American English (a different language from British English) and the USA one country where we all speak the same language (in theory, anyway). I have learned enough to know that until we develop true artificial intelligence, complex translations will be beyond the capabilities of computers or programmers. There is simply too much complexity and nuance in any language to be analyzed by the type of linear logic employed by computers.

I strongly urge the reader to resist the installation of Spanish (or any other language for that matter) into our American vocabulary, lest we not be able to use English as a scientific language. One language for the USA is an absolute requirement for understanding and the eventual interconnection of a living Earth's organism and mind. In fact, one universal language (it may as well be English) is important for interconnecting the evolving living Earth's ID.

In this manuscript I have tried to use American English to best explain my theory of UIDE. It is written in HTML and has been processed by my computers and my editor to get the grammar and spelling more usable to the greatest number of readers. Wherever I have used italics, it means I am quoting from other public domain sources from the Internet. The source data for these quotations is listed in the Reference section.

I have referenced here one person's published thoughts, "InfiniteNow," from "HSF Forum," who says: "If you were to simply preface this comment with, I don't have any solid proof, but I personally believe that... I would not take issue with it. However, you have stated it in terms of the absolute, and for that I will request you support your statement with evidence beside personally written manuscripts. " Ubiquitously, as the author, most of my statements are in the absolute, backed up with proof or references to those who are accepted as evidence. With this in mind I would also agree with InfiniteNow from HSF with respect to UIDE. Some area of this theory may be beyond absolute proof, at our current level of understanding. UIDE is a roadmap giving the reader considerable data to find his way in this difficult theoretical nightmare of language, science, artificial intelligence (AI), Intuitive Intelligence (II), mathematics, and religion.

The Earth's species (including man's technology) is evolving at an exponential rate. When the Earth's communications structures are networked to an ultimate communication capacity, its scientific community may then be able to accept the proof of UIDE. Then all the Earth's human communities shall have been linked together in a massive brain ID communication network more able to grasp UIDE at work.

Can there ever be a unified theory of an intelligent Universe via evolution that is accepted as truth by humans? Do we individual humans even have the brain power to know and understand the Universe's true mechanism? If our brains, through evolution (Refer to baby Lucy), do reach the point when we can handle the vast computations required to understand, how would it affect the human intelligentsia? Just because Lucy lived on Earth three million years ago does not mean all humans now residing on Earth, developed on Earth. I believe that the interconnected brains of millions of humans can better understand UIDE, when connected through an Internet like network, than the individual can.

The Universe may not be as Earthmen now think it is, understanding UIDE may teach otherwise.

CHAPTER 1

Universe's, Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE)

The Universe's Intelligent Design via Evolution (UIDE), pronounced U-DE, was first published in HTML live on the Internet. It was changed daily as written. It is a roadmap designed to give man an intelligent hypothesis of how to know and understand the Universe in which he lives and dies. It is understood that as time advances so does data recording technology. It is important to save original data for future recording mechanics. In fact, in the pass fifteen years we have advanced from the VCR tape to the CD and DVD disk. What might be next is a mystery--so hold on to my book.

This was a rare opportunity for reliability in technology with the cooperation of online forums live on the Internet. The Internet enabled my readers to recommend changes to and comments on (fripro1@fripro.com) this manuscript with respect to its content, i.e. technology, theology, science, mathematics, and physics.

It is a new approach to writing when as the author I was out on the proverbial limb, publishing daily my writings, full well knowing it was not only theoretically incomplete also had grammatical, spelling, and factual errors (which in time were corrected, by all) then publishing it as a book in full color with photos, graphics, and Internet references.

The many changes, additions, and submissions of ideas from various science reader forums and fellow scientists subjected me, as the author, to writing the manuscript in a constant state of revision. The automatic date and the revision number after the authors name on the on line Rom manuscript's title page helped the online reader to know if it was the latest revision. Revision #68 marked as the final manuscript. This is the pioneered format by which my publisher received my manuscript.

The UIDE theory explains the construction of the Universe and its conscious intelligent mind (ID) capable of decision-making. It is based on many scientific experiments, discoveries, inventions by the author, theories, and operational tests of others. There are many theoretical and mathematical passageways to UIDE's outcome. Skeptics question how a Universe have a brain. Well, how then does a human have a brain? Or, one might ask, how can a God have a brain. There is a strong element to conservative thinking in science, and many are influence by religion; thereby there are varied resentments to the principles of the UIDE theory.

If the Universe is an intelligent mind (ID) capable of decision-making, is that artificial? No, it is not, but we must differentiate between the religious view of Intelligent design (Id) which is artificial because it was made by man, and the Universe's Intelligent Design (ID) which is not made by man, and therefore is not artificial. I have also been asked; Why not call your manuscript Intelligent Design? Therein lies the whole controversy. Intelligent design by whom? Man, the Universe, artificial deities man created, or UIDE?

In Webster's dictionary, artificial means: "made by man not found in nature." Intelligent means "the capacity to perceive and comprehend meaning; information, the power of the mind to accept and understand." Therefore man is not the design source of this intelligence, and the reason he is not is because what he creates is artificial. Man and the trillions of species that inhabit Earth are programmed or directed by UIDE to build the great monuments necessary to accomplish the Universe's plans for Earth's evolution as a living and thinking organism.

Some men will be insulted as they read this manuscript. They believe they hold the truth and are visionary thinkers. Very few are. Are you? Most Earthmen believe they are capable of generating intelligent design. Yes, they can; however, it is artificial. Therefore man’s religions are artificial because he created them....

Man in his numbers, as a team, can build most anything. Alone, he can only think, and toil, and preach, soon to fail, except for a few who seem to excel. Is man being directed to build a fantastic interconnected network of billions of brains on Earth through our fantastic advances in network technology. Thus evolution theory is in practice by man.

It always amazes me how man working alone can not accomplish much except for putting a few iron or wood beams in place, but put thousands on the job, working with an intelligent design and men will through mechanical evolution, build the grandest of monuments and technological advances. Men on Earth (even animal species) are the hands of the Universe. Men will explore and populate the Universe or die trying. Look at the magnificent space station men have jointly built. Individual men can make big mistakes, unable to solve an important real problem, but if the problem is networked to a large team the mistakes are minimized and the problem may be solved.

The International Space Station demonstrates my point, Man in numbers can build most anything, (NASA photo)

I am implying that the Universe's intelligence (as a living organism, its mind's ID) is behind its own design and evolution. It is man's source of knowledge. It is mens, and other species', hands, etc., that carry out the Earth's evolution, through the Universe's direction. Such a plan, pre-designed by a living intelligent universal mind, ID, I have called UIDE.

I would like to mention that our Earth is a living organism in the process of evolving into a thinking organism through the interconnections of the thinking and physical power of its species.

I have been asked by a online reader, why evolution with respect to the Universe? I replied, the Universe does to some extent evolve; however, it really only changes it's configuration. Earth evolves by commands from UIDE through the hands of men and other Earth species. There is certainly room in this statement for consideration of other's thoughts, including the reader's. I would appreciate your comments, by Email, at

It is the Universe's mind's (ID), a short definition for the thinking mind of the Universe that is carrying out its work by directing live species everywhere, to do its bidding--through programming each individual's pre-stored information. When UIDE implants commands into individual minds, in their DNA or equivalent software, prior to (or even after) their birth, billions of humans and other species build together on these pre-programmed orders.

The Hubble telescope team has made an alarming discovery. It has focused on a distant cluster that has the form of a human DNA helix. (Of course it is not the human form) but it sure looks like a DNA helix through the Hubble space telescope. What does that imply?

Double helix nebula

A color-enhanced version of the infrared signal to make the Double Helix Nebla. The spots are mostly red giants and red super giants. Many other stars are present, but are too dim to appear. (Credit:NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA.)

On a recent broadcast at the program Coast to Coast with George Norway, a guest said: that if DNA is recovered from a person and placed at a distant location, and that same person has an emotional response to some stimuli, the measuring of vibrations of the DNA responded. If this is true, there may be an answer to instantaneous information being transmitted over a long distance. I prefer to think long and hard about this.

Reviewing the above thoughts, one would wonder if there is some validity in the Universe being a living mind and organism.

It's a fact that many of Earth's living species do know what to do to survive as soon as they are born. For example, The deer (fawn) knows it must stand up and walk immediately after birth or be attacked by another species planning to end its life for food, etc., Man alone needs the long time help of a two parents to survive and to be educated (programmed). Some call it brainwashed.

Why do animals know what to do in order to stay alive? We call it innate. If an animal has pre-programming, does man, and any alien species the Universe created, also have this innate programming prior to birth?

The BigDog in the Theology forum of Science published this interesting comment: "There is an overriding imperative in the Universe to bring order over chaos. And that universal imperative drives all things into a perpetual state of continuous improvement. Always seeking greater order, greater efficiency, greater wisdom, and greater intelligence. And mankind is driven by this imperative, regardless of how individual men may otherwise believe." (Permission was granted by BigDog to reprint his statement. This does not imply his endorsement of the UIDE theory.)

CHAPTER 2

Artificial Intelligence

If the world's population were to organize, nothing could stop them from building the Earth's Mind (ID)--not even the "good old boys' network.” The Internet is bringing the world's population together, helping to build the Earth's networked thinking mind (ID) . Does this not make you wonder: could it be true? Are we programmed humans who only want to hear what we have been taught? We may already be programmed artificial intelligence (AI) R.U.Rs, Rossum's Universal Robots. (Refer to Chapter 6). Man is now in the clumsy stage of computer directed machines, more and more, being designed in man's image, directed by Universal Intelligence (UIDE).

Dr. Robert Berman CPSC, of Houston, Texas, and of Ultra~Teslan International, is soon to be on line at www.UFO.cc ⁴. With respect to R.U.R.s Universal Robots (refer to Chapter 6), Berman said: If one spells the word 'Robot' backwards it is 'Tobor,' and this means slave in Slavic languages, the language that the famous play, 'Rossum's Universal Robots,' was written in. This play was based on the Czech playwright Karl Kapek, who wrote in 1923 the original play named 'R.U.R. (Refer to Chapter 6.)

Berman continues: A more perfect Robot (AI) Artificial Intelligence is not dangerous, built into Robot minds; however, logic trees in (AI) can find another pathway if the first path is in error. It learns as it goes, so it is not a lie detector. Intuitive Intelligence (II) if interacting with the human beings can have negative events (for good or evil). It is in a sense a Lie Detector. When humans interact with a (II) Intuitive Intelligence programmed Robot, they could have real problems with a malfunctioning (II) Android or Robot. II programmed Robots should not be used in industrial activities. It would be best to utilize AI programmed Robots therein.

With nano-tech science, researchers (Nobel prize for chemistry winner Dr. Richard Smalley of Rice University, deceased) professed, advances in human to robot interaction should not be underestimated. Could humans the Universe's children, together with nano-tech technology, be really sophisticated robots? Humans may be really Artificial Intelligent programmed Intuitive Intelligence (II) robots. I am sure many of my readers will object to this classification, but it is a possibility that should be considered.

It is difficult to understand the idea that man’s job on Earth is to create, build, and utilize Earth's living organisms to further its brain construction now in progress. If he does not carry on with Earth's brain building goal, as directed by UIDE, he will be removed and replaced by R.U.R.s. He may even build his own replacement when he can no longer cope with the environment of this enormous task. In fact, Earth as a living organism could blow itself to bits, violating (or by design) the programmed commands from UIDE. The reason is, the Earth some day will have a thinking mind, ID of its own. John Nash also says in his new book, "The Earth may be a entity by itself (the Biophysics of the Earth), also known as the Geya Hypnotist (also Sophia). Another way of describing the Earth is, it is a living organism."

Men of theology say their god gave them the word. UIDE implies that the Universe itself programmed man in this respect, so he (man) wrote the great books (the Bible, Koran etc.) of Earth's many hundreds of religions and designed the laws by which he is to live. These men who wrote the books did not have the full knowledge (only a few thousand years ago) or the communication tools to write modern scientific truths. Of course, if someone else handed them to him, that is another issue.

Today’s scientists believe they have the word; for planning, creating, evolving, and giving us an ever-changing theory of how the Universe began and how it all will end. We who live now are no different than the religious writers of the past, by which most of us are programmed to live. The religious experts say god inspired them. The theoretical (UIDE) thinkers say otherwise, that the Universe will never end and had no beginning.

I have no quarrel with Bernard Haisch conclusions 'The God Theory', but his book is not my belief. We must understand that the Universe's (UIDE) theory does imply that the Universe does not directly have to be our human creator. I admit that this is my written viewpoint; however, with a large scientific background, in both inventions and experience, I would hope I can give rise to the reader recognizing UIDE as a road map to understanding the mechanic of the Universe.

Originally posted by Boerseun on forums hypography. With all due respect Tom, your website's a mess. I couldn't find the page explaining what a 'WIT' particle is. I would appreciate it if you could elaborate on the 'WIT' particle a little further. And also, if you could inform us of any credible sources like CERN actually observing something that might be called a 'WIT' particle. If he navigated the Table of Contents page in my technical web site FAIRBAIRN,T.E. he could have answered his own question. To save time I did publish the answer on the Forum for him. I really did appreciate his question as it made me think--what am I saying, and am I writing it accurately.

Ancient-scribes, believed honestly that they had the word. The Art of learning and thus reading and writing was one of the most powerful forces in the ancient Egyptian civilization. Almost all of our known knowledge about the ancient Egyptians came from the work and art of the ancient Egyptian scribe. "Individuals do make progress; however, the “dynastic controlled "good old boys" have the money and the power. Without their backing and approval, nothing will prosper; and an individual humanoid will have a very difficult time convincing the scientific populace (especially the religious right) that they may not have the “way of the truth.”

Science and industrial organizations, with their mathematical backgrounds, often use their math skill, to convince the governments of the world to pay for their ideas and creations. These grant proposals are often inadequate for the job intended, and many systems fail to operate the way they were planned. In spite of this (when humans work together) man makes progress as long as he keeps an open mind.

Down through the ages, our schools, universities, etc., were teaching the history (the word) of what the human race had learned over the past few thousand years and what they have since learned from fossil records. Earthmen pride themselves in believing they have the word. Then they continue to teach the word right or wrong. Do not discount an individual who may have a different theory of the word. He could have hit it right--to the chagrin of the educated.

This concept (the word) was taught in the past. For example: Earth is flat and men could fall off its edge. Earth is the center of the Universe. The big bang created us all. There is a heaven and a hell. One living God created us all. Earth is the only populated planet. The Universe will end. God must be feared. Survival of the fittest.

Religious systems were created by the ruling class to keep order among the people (Karl Marx said: "religion is the opiate of the mass (people)". These dynasties (the ruling class) utilized religions to keep humans slaves to their exotic selfish plans. Brainpower and education by the visionary thinker will progress, evolve, educate, and create new technologies here on Earth and in space. To get a conservative religious scientist to change his thinking is difficult.

These new ideas conveyed to man by UIDE, if men are listening, will be profound. It will advance Earth's living organism through evolution to a higher order of ID. This is accomplished by the Universe’s plan for evolution (change). Is it our job (we humans) to know, understand, and carry out Earth's evolution building it to a higher order of intelligence, as programmed by our DNA (or other unknown programming).

John Nash, in a very late book he is about to publish, said, "The Worlds greatest problem for survival, is the very dangerous and illusional religious ideologies, that clash. I am convinced terrorism is a real war between the two major religions of the Earth, namely Christianity and Islam."

Religious terrorism certainly was not the plan of the Universe but man's mistake creating these irresponsible religions. We must grow in tolerance and understanding. If we do not, Earth may be destroyed. Earth is a living organism, and its entire species, including man, are part of this living organism. Together they will build or destroy the Universe's plan for Earth and other livable planets.

I must restate the premise put forth in this manuscript. The Universe’s ID evolves (changes state) and directs man to build its ID on Earth and perhaps later in the heavens of space. Man is the helping hand (the builder) on Earth, through the great Universe’s ID’s direction by UIDE. If man does not evolve to a higher order, man may someday replace himself.

I have put forth many questions about the Universe, mankind, and its trillions of living species, the reason being, many readers may not accept the concept of UIDE, but are willing to read, think, and maintain an open mind. Now it requires me to give candid answers to the many issues I have raised..

Earth plays a small part (in comparison to its size, alike to that of but one grain of sand on its beaches) of the Universal ID’s fantastic existence. The Universe refurbishes itself, for it always was and always will be, while man replaces himself through creation. What form humans will take in the future, who knows; however, we are on our way to R.U.R., Rossum's Universal Robots, one way or another. (Refer to Chapter 6).

Humans on this small planet Earth cannot survive without UIDE, the Universe's plan and direction. There certainly are billions more planets in the vast Universe that can accomplish the same job if Earthmen and Earth fail to evolve according to UIDE's plan.

The un-science of Intelligent design (Id) is a religious catch phrase we all have heard in one form or another. No species can last unless the process of improving himself is approaching logarithmic growth. Make no mistake we humanoids here on Earth are in the process of replacing ourselves just as in R.U.R. (Refer to Chapter 6.) We will do it peacefully or by war. If peacefully (I have my doubts), one can see what is taking place now in the twentyfirst century here on Earth.

Humans may not be able to replace themselves with DNA or cloning as yet because of religious groups who object that they consider it to be against the word of their god. One might ask, how was that "word of god" written?

Man created religions headed by, God, Allah, Yahweh, Buddha, or what have you depending whose religious books, told him what to do. The ironic part of it is, man created all of the thousands of religions here on Earth now intends to color this creation by calling it "Intelligent design" (Id). Man should be agnostic, if he wants a free will. (Meaning: neither accepting god or not believing. Also, one who doubts that there is a god or questions whether Earthmen have a life hereafter.)

Man's historians write all kinds of theories to safeguard their created religious teachings. In fact, many men are so deeply entrenched in these various religions that they would die or kill for it, for what they falsely believe is a better life in the afterworld. Examples include the Egyptians and their great tombs and now also the suicide terrorists in Earth's 21st century chronicle.

These Egyptian tombs and their contents (fossil remains) do help us understand our historical background; however, it is only a history of man a few thousand years back. The Universe and all it contains are ageless. The big bang is estimated at 13 billion years ago. It is supposed to be the beginning of the Universe. Surely you do not believe this was the Universe's beginning? If you believe this, as hundreds of conservative scientists do, then tell me how this big bang' was created, and by whom?

I also refer you to the following expert in the field of evolution with respect to theological Intelligent design (Id). UIDE is not a theological version of Intelligent design, it is a scientific version.

Evolution vs. Creationism: Eugenie Scott, a physical anthropologist, has been the director of the National Center for Science Education for nearly twenty years. A former president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, she is one of the nation’s leading defenders of the theory of evolution and a vocal critic of creationism and Intelligent design (Id) theory. She is the author of the widely used and comprehensive textbook Evolution vs. Creationism.

In her interview with DJ Grothe, she recounts events in the recent Dover, Pennsylvania, Intelligent design case and discusses why Id, religious Intelligent design, fails as a scientific theory.

CHAPTER 3

Mass-Wave Formula, Unified Theory of the Universe (WIT Particles)

The Universal constant of mass, the WIT particle, is a possible key to the "unified" theory of the Universe, which does not violate the quantum theory. I reconstructed DeBroglie's mass/wave formula of 1924. This formula is directly from Einstein and Planck, but I used it to discover the basic particle mass composition of the Universe's ether's sea. I call this particle the WIT particle. (Read these simple math calculations carefully, referring to Chapter 4.) Fairbairn's ether Hypothesis k_f = h /c²was also calculated from DeBorlie.

You might be surprised at the simplicity of the concept. The WIT particle mass does not violate the quantum theory. To identify the WIT particle mass, the sea of particles make up Newton's ether atmosphere of the Universe. (Refer to Chapter 4 for mathematical proofs.)

Note: the author gives the ether particle mass a name WIT. A WIT is calculated at: 7.371963x 10^-48 grams.

Why would a WIT particle have this mass in grams? It is based on the velocity of light through the media of the Universe. That media is the ether; however, the ether must be made of particles to function properly as a wave/mass duality. The velocity of that wave through the ether is based on the density of the ether. This is the reason the velocity of light is what it is.

Note: The composition of the ether atmosphere of the Universe is the WIT Particles. Refer to Chapter 4 for calculations. I chose Planck's constant to calculate the WIT particle mass the motive being, Planck's Time is a measure of time that a wave of UV light in ether takes to cross the distance equal to the Planck Length. Planck length is a measure of the density of the WIT particles ether atmosphere of the Universe, thus determining the speed of UV light in the ether of the Universe's atmosphere.

I am reprinting a statement from DeBorlie nobel-prize-laureate (to whom I am in deep debt). He (Louis de Broglie) said:

The history of science teaches that the greatest advances in the scientific domain have been achieved by bold thinkers who perceived new and fruitful approaches that others failed to notice. If one had taken the ideas of these scientific geniuses who have been the promoters of modern science and submitted them to committees of specialists, there is no doubt that the latter would have viewed them as extravagant and would have discarded them for the very reason of their originality and profundity.

More recently, in the domain of theoretical physics, of which I can speak with knowledge, the magnificent novel conceptions of Lorentz and Planck, and particularly Einstein also clashed with the incomprehension of eminent scientists. The new ideas here triumphed; but, in proportion as the organization of research becomes more rigid, the danger increases that new and fruitful ideas will be unable to develop freely.

Let us state in a few words the conclusion to be drawn from the foregoing. While, by the very force of circumstances, research and teaching are weighted down by administrative structures and financial concerns and by the heavy armature of strict regulations and planning, it becomes more indispensable than ever to preserve the freedom of scientific research and the freedom of initiative for the original investigators, because these freedoms have always been and will always remain the most fertile sources for the grand progress of science.

The WIT particle is a monopole mass, calculated at: 7.371963x 10^-48 grams. (Refer to Chapter 4 for calculations.) It is not magnetic, has no north or south pole, no plus or negative charge, and perhaps no spin either. If the WIT particle could be detected in a ether atmosphere it might have random Brownian motion. All WIT particles have in close proximity to the same mass and size; however, their density in great numbers could change in specific parts of the Universe. This could also imply that the velocity of light could be different in some parts of the Universe. In our section of the Universe (created by the big bang) it has been measured exactly by the National Bureau of Standards, of the U.S. government.

The number of particles that make up Newton's ether is nearly uncountable as they weigh only 7.371963x10^-48 grams each. I refer you to the utilization of the proven formulas by Einstein, DeBorlie, and Planck needed to calculate this adamant mass consequence. (Refer to Chapter 4) The particle calculations outlined in Chapter 4 solve the problem of the inconsistency between two incompatible theories, that of the General Theory of Relativity (the understanding of mass in space) and the Quantum Mechanics theory (the understanding of mass particles on the subatomic scale) needed to understand evolution of the species on Earth.

My test with high-powered operating Laser Energy Beam systems, leads me to believe that the electron may consist of billions of WIT particles in a vortex arrangement. So also all other mass, example the neutron, and other mass ranging in size, from the macroscopic to the microscopic, may be constructed of the Wit particles in a vortex analogy. As I have said before in this manuscript that the right spinning electron vortex is the opposite of the left spinning positron vortex. It may also explain the Influence of Casimir effect⁴³as a result of London-van der Waals Forces; example, very smoothed plates will stick together as if their structure's vortex orbits are merged.

This vortex analogy can be seen in the ether space of the Universe. Where the immeasurable number of galaxies demonstrates how vortexes of mass particles can be described like the electron also being a vortex, similar in construction to miniature galaxies in space. I am sure the neutron follows the same design. Small known particles are not really particles at all, but miniature vortexes of WIT particles as described. I do not like to refer to the electron or neutron as particles as they seem to be more analogous to a vortex or miniature galaxy-tornados.

We humans here on Earth must not fall into the class of those who do not think beyond what they may have been taught. We must be visionary thinkers. We all know that the theories that humans create (about the unknown) change from time to time. Now that we have reports from the Hubble telescope and Neutron microscopes. We can now apply this to unlocking the secrets of the unknown Universe.

The current theory of the neutron is they are magnetic and have a magnetic moment and are electrically neutral (according to size and direction). In a beam format, they can be polarized. They can have short and long wavelengths. Note: if this is the case, and I am told it is, then the neutron must consist of WIT particles in a vortex construction. If one could direct clouds of neutrons of opposite polarity at each other, then some neutrons would probably break up into the basic WIT particles and scatter into the ether. CERN should investigate this.

Why bring up this highly technical mathematical theorem (the WIT particle mass) in this manuscript? The reason is, we must prove that the Universe's atmosphere is present in the form of Newton's ether (aether) and how it really operates.

It is important that when reading the mass wave formula below, and to better understand the implication of its theoretical model of the universal ether (WIT particles) atmosphere of the Universe, that you view the excellent streaming video: "Cerenkov Light from Fermi Lab" produced by FNAL Visual Media Services. (Log on directly to Fermi Labs News Service at: Cerenkov Light from Fermi Lab¹ or use the 3" inch CD rom that is also available.) (Refer to the back cover). This video shows in detail how the mass wave mechanics operate in any media. Dark matter (we have been told) makes up about 23 percent of the Universe's mass-energy budget. Normal matter, the stuff of stars, planets, and people, contributes just 4 percent. The rest of the Universe is driven by an even more mysterious thing (we are told) called dark energy. Perhaps the WIT particle ether sea can explain dark matter (the ether), and dark energy (the vortex effect on equal and opposite polarities on all mass in the Universe.)

What is this WIT particle? Fairbairn states his constant k_fis hisuniversal constant of Newton's elusive ether atmosphere of the Universe, and this constant is gram-seconds (calculated at k_f = 7.371963x 10^-48g sec); this may explain the "various matter'' in space. Measurements show that these "dark matters" must make up about 96 percent of the Universe, but have yet to be seen. (Refer to calculations in Chapter 4. ) The question to physics lovers is, how do you detect a particle (I named it the WIT particle) that is 7.371963x 10^-48 grams, comprising Newton's "ether sea." No wonder the dark matter cannot as yet be seen.

The WIT particles are probably rushing right through our humanoid bodies as you read these words. I believe we are made from them in complex vortex building blocks defined over a time period of more than trillions of light years of directed evolution. The timeless Universe has had plenty of time to direct our evolution by UIDE.

If one were to look in the direction NASA's Specter Space Telescope is pointed toward deep space, or the other way through the more sophisticated neutron microscope, one would resolve the mass being observed as made of the WIT basic particle. The WIT particle being a single monopole particle with a resolution of 7.371963x 10^-48grams, forms a particle sea that is just as real as the water molecules are in Earth’s oceans or the air molecules in Earth's atmosphere. Of course, no microscope today can resolve the WIT particle.

I refer you to an article of interest by Antije Plannkuchen at newvortex. Please pay particular attention to page 2 and 3 wherein Helmholtz and Kelvin are referenced. Kelvin says "No sane person doubts the existence of the ether, we are sorely troubled when we are asked to describe it." Kelvin welcomed Hemholtz's vortex theory as did James Clark Maxwell and applied it to the ether. Ezra Pound also mention the "intelligent agent" created the Universe but did not equate it to a god. A following statement was reprinted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Isaac Newton disproved the ether æther "vortex theory" of planetary motion but later proposed a "new" æther, exceptionally fluid, whose density was affected by the local density of matter and local gravitational field strength. Newton also said that he did not know whether his new æther should be particulate or not if it were particulate, the particles would have to be incredibly small, even smaller than light-corpuscles. Fairbairn,T.E. author agrees with Newton that the particles would have to be incredibly small, and would have to have a mass of m = 7.371963x 10^-48 grams in order to satisfy the two equations of Einstein and Planck for the velocity of light in the ether Universe (Refer to Chapter 4.)

True, the Universe is made of both mass and electromagnetic waves (radiation). The important difference, that today’s physic teachers do not agree on, is, how does mass, electromagnetic waves, and gravity all enfold in one universal theorem. No one yet has tied them all together. The WIT particle calculations solve the problem of the inconsistency between two incompatible theories, that of the General Theory of Relativity (the understanding of mass in space) and the Quantum Mechanics Theory (the understanding of mass particles on the sub atomic scale). The two theories, that of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, are reciprocally incompatible.

I conducted the following ‘"universe-like&q